Looking for a Professional INFO-GRAPHICS DESIGNER ? Order Now $5

Feminists of toxic feminism destroying family, breaking social chain and collapsing moralities

Second wave feminism of toxic feminists have made it clear that they regard women’s conventional monetary dependence on men as the root of all evil


In all the dialogue about the free marketplace and government interventions, hardly any mention was made of a 3rd and more malignant element in the decline of marriage: toxic feminism, the nearly universally widespread ideology whose specific aim has been to dismantle the supportive function of the male in the family.

State intervention and its destructive consequences were exceptionally amplified via accommodation to many toxic feminist policies, which has actively sought to undermine the male breadwinner function.

Yet it's the male breadwinner position which middle-class girls, often feminists themselves, benefit from, both through marriage and after they get divorced. Working-class ladies, then again do no longer get married, as the forces ranged towards their men imply they are unable to support a family.

Second-wave feminists have continually made it clear that they regard women’s conventional monetary dependence on men as the root of all evil.

This financial inequality is the very essence of patriarchy which is seen as the oppression and exploitation of the females by males based totally on the economic strength of the husband and father in the household.

And feminists have been very clear that they want to eliminate it.

Feminism has made some progress over the years. In case you observe the poorest and least socially balanced areas in the USA, you will find one variable continually missing: fathers. More, in particular, moms who are married to the father of their children.

Alarmingly, the majority of mothers consider that absent or uninvolved dads can without difficulty be replaced by themselves or another guy no matter the evidence that solid marriages result in glad, healthy, and stimulated youngsters, which results in stronger communities, more possibilities, and greater equality.

Some of the impacts of toxic feminism are highlighted beneath;

Impact on Physical health

 in comparison with kids in intact, married households, children in cohabiting families (a parent and their girlfriend or boyfriend) are much more likely to have a physical or mental health condition and are 3 times much more likely to suffer bodily, sexual, or emotional abuse. Sad couples have depressed immune systems and their children have elevated stress hormones. Stress is regulated by social systems; the brain regions involved in social relationships are the ones that also control the stress response. They develop collectively, and consequently development troubles in the stress response can interfere with the improvement of social and emotional functioning and vice versa.

Impact on Mental fitness

kids raised by unmarried moms are much more likely to be on ADHD medication and are much more likely to need treatment for emotional or behavioral problems

Like adults, youngsters who grew up with married parents are much less possibly to have mental health issues (most especially the daughters).

Impact on Poverty

both bodily and mental health are influenced by socioeconomic status. Children of unmarried parents (four out of 5 of which are females ) are far more likely to grow up in poverty and have lower rates of upward mobility than kids of married parents.

The contemporary welfare system does not encourage single moms to establish a stable two-parent family despite a part of welfare funds allotted to promote this sort of family structure.

This is said because the benefits that married women gain from the government greatly pales in comparison to the benefits on offer for single mothers.

Also, women who are brought up in the welfare system have a higher tendency to grow up and end up on welfare themselves while continuing the vicious cycle.

Teen pregnancy and crime

daughters of single moms are more likely to engage in early sexual activity and grow to be teenager mothers, which, in all likelihood, makes them much more likely to rely on welfare and their children less probable to grow up with their fathers. The majority of inmates grew up without their fathers

Drugs and alcohol

kids of unmarried parents have a considerably better probability of drug use. Teenagers who've much less than three family dinners a week are much more likely to use tobacco, more than twice as possibly to drink alcohol, more likely to use marijuana, and almost 4 times likelier to be involved in drug use in the future.

Impact on School

children of married parents have fewer studying disabilities; score better in analyzing, better in verbal and problem-solving talents, higher on most of the academic measures, and better on measures of social competence. Children who grow up without fathers are much less in all likelihood to attend college (this is particularly true for sons).

Future profits

one of the longest-running studies on the development of adult, the Harvard grant study, found that men that had warm childhoods I.e people who had close relationships with their parents (who were married) and at least one sibling — make 50 percent more cash than their friends who grew up with separated parents or in hostile households.

Given the statistics above, it can be argued that if the toxic side of feminism, in reality, cared about helping all girls, it will advocate for the involvement of fathers, so no daughter would grow up disadvantaged and every son could be a capable partner to those daughters. Yet, while feminism purports itself to be the movement for equality, it is very silent when it comes to father’s rights.

Why could feminists try to stop father involvement, the very factor that insulates in opposition to poverty and inequality ?

Post a Comment

Please do not enter any spam link...
© A Balancer. All rights reserved. Made by ABalancer